Oak leaf with water droplets. |
Our first close view of the Cathedral of St. James through the trees of Alameda Park. |
A more traditional view of the cathedral, from the same park. |
There’s a special door into the cathedral that is kept open only during holy years, and it turns out that there was a ceremony and mass to formally close the door for the year on Dec 31 at 4:30. Many of the other pilgrims left the last hostel well before dawn on that morning so that they could arrive at the cathedral and enter through the door of St. James before it closed.
One of the small chapels inside the cathedral. |
We can't figure out how to rotate this video sideways, but seeing as how we just spent 20 minutes uploading it while sitting in a cafe drinking lots of tea, this is just how it's going to have to be. :) Notice, if you have the sound turned on, you can hear Corvid exclaiming in the background.
Many spiritual guides emphasize the role of paradox in spiritual understanding. John Brierley (author of our camino guide) writes,
With all the great discoveries made within the sense-perceptible world of science, we have never been able to see the super-sensible. Not even the most powerful telescope on earth has been able to glimpse even the tiniest fragment of God. Knowledge of Higher Worlds does not come from exploring the physical universe within the laboratory of the mind, but in diving into the mysteries. Paradox is at the heart of the spiritual quest, and so the top of the mountain becomes a symbol of the wisdom often found in the lowest point of the journey and within the humblest of hearts.
In many eastern philosophies, a similar theme regarding dualities can be found. Much has been written about the tendency of rationally-trained Western minds to over-emphasize dualities and the ability of Easterners to think more relatively and be more comfortable with paradox. Here are two passages from the two representative books I have been carrying.
While Lord Krishna is educating Arjuna in the Bhagavad-Gita, he explains that Arjuna should work to “become free from the pairs of opposites,” which the translator footnotes with examples—“Heat and cold, pleasure and pain, etc. The seeming contradictions of the relative world.”
When people see some things as beautiful,
other things become ugly.
When people see some things as good,
other things become bad.
Being and non-being create each other.
Difficult and easy support each other.
Long and short define each other.
High and low depend on each other.
Before and after follow each other.
As I understand it, this passage captures the essence of the yin-yang symbol.
A traditional camino marker with bags of trash scattered behind it. This was in one of the most industrial areas through which we walked. Dualism or paradox? |
So the challenge of reconciling dualisms, or becoming comfortable with the mystery of paradoxes, has been on my mind during this pilgrimage. My usual route to accomplishing this goal is to interpret phenomenon on a spectrum or gradient (a particular shade of gray rather than black or white) rather than to accept that two categories that appear mutually exclusive can actually exist simultaneously (paradox). In addition, my rational mind is on a ceaseless quest to categorize things, whether into two dualistic categories or into some other typology (such as the identification of species—what is that orange-breasted, sparrow-like, lovely-voiced bird that we’re seeing EVERYWHERE?). Clearly, I’ve made some obvious contrasts in regards to the Cathedral of St. James, especially regarding the sacred (altars and masses) and the profane (fireworks set off from the cathedral roof). What are some of the other apparent dualisms or categorizations that have been especially challenging for me to reconcile on this journey?
One of the others that I’ve already written about is the divide between “nature” and “human.” One of the comments on the last post I wrote about nature noted that wilderness can only exist when there is a contrasting understanding of civilization. I don’t actually think that pure “wilderness” exists, or that pure “nature” or “human” exists. Hence the quotation marks. These are labels that we use for the convenience of talking about something and having a mutual understanding about what the words symbolize. And yet I can’t seem to shake the feeling that “natural” is somehow “better.” I feel better when I am in a biodiverse area, and science tells me that in general, the ecosystem is healthier when it’s more biodiverse, which I find morally desirable. So as I’ve already noted, this is a duality that is particularly difficult for me to reconcile. I can intellectually accept that cities and countryside or wilderness are mutually interdependent, but my perception is that countryside and forests make me feel healthier. That’s certainly just been reinforced on this camino. I enjoy visiting the ancient centers in these European towns and cities, but leaving a rural area to walk through the suburbs to get to them is fairly torturous for me. I suppose that for me, this is the painful challenge that a pilgrimage is supposed to bring, since I haven’t had a single blister or really any other physical pain of which to complain.
One of the most beautiful views we had along the camino. This is an inlet of the ocean between Redondela and Pontevedra. |
Corvid walking with several other pilgrims (some on bikes) on a particularly busy section of the camino. |
More directly related to the last five days or our walk, we have experienced many changes in our transition from Portugal to Spain, separate from the increase in pilgrims. It’s rather shocking to realize what different countries these two are, even though they’re neighbors in the European Union. It’s quite clear they’re not like los Estados Unidos. Language seems to have a lot to do with that. Of course, anthropologists know that language and culture go hand-in-hand. But it’s not fair to say that there’s a totally abrupt change at the border. In the Spanish state of Galicia, where Santiago de Compostela is located, a particular dialect of Spanish is spoken, which, to my untrained ear, sounds a bit like it could be a blend of Portuguese and Spanish Castellano. Regardless, it has been slightly miraculous to feel as though I can communicate again and gratifying to re-discover that I get along quite well in Spanish. Words come out of my mouth that I had no idea that I remembered. Miraculous.
But besides the language, there are other visible differences. The types of narrow village roads that would have been cobblestoned in Portugal are paved in Spain. While this does make for slightly more comfortable walking, it’s much less aesthetically appealing. Also, as I mentioned in my last post, the environment has changed a bit. There’s no question that the climate is different, and I’d really like to know why. We’ve had nothing but gray weather, some days with full-on rain in Spain. Of course, this is largely influenced by weather patterns, but the ferns growing all over the place, including in the trees, around the coast of Spain bespeak a much damper climate overall, which our guidebook author confirms as well. The northwest coast of Spain resembles the Pacific Northwest in the US, with smaller trees, and only a few species—the ever-present eucalyptus and pine, and some sort of small, scraggly but very charming oak.
(You’re experiencing one of the almost insurmountable challenges which is one of the primary reasons we haven’t been blogging as much as we would have liked—I insist on writing something different from a “first we did this, then we did this” post, but writing a logical essay and captions for Old Bay’s photos that at least somewhat relate to the text, at 8 o’clock at night after walking for 14 or more miles, is a bit loco.)
There actually seem to be a larger number of friendly dogs in Spain than in Portugal, but this Spanish dog had no interest in making friends with pilgrims. |
But perhaps the most obvious duality and most challenging paradox to reconcile is that of a relationship between two individuals in a partnership like marriage. On this journey, not only have Old Bay and I celebrated Christmas and New Year’s together, but we have also marked our fourth wedding anniversary, and our 14th year together as a couple. Our togetherness has been no small part of our pilgrimage. A question came to me several days ago that I think captures the nature of the paradox of marriage: “Can two people walk the same path, have two completely different perspectives on it, and still find fulfillment in sharing it?” Sorry, I’m not going to explore this question any more deeply for you. Suffice to say that this blog has been a representation of that question, in that Old Bay’s photos represent his perspective and my words represent mine (though both aspects only scratch the surface, claro). I’ll leave it to you to judge whether we’ve integrated our perspectives effectively and reconciled our own paradoxes.
In quantum mechanics there is the famous (among scientists) paradox of Einstein's cat in a box. In a closed box is a cat and some radioactive material that emits a particle randomly; we have no idea when the partcle will be emitted. When a particle is emitted, a detector allows the release of a lethal gas from a vial in the box, and the cat dies. (We can use a fake cat, so don't get upset!) In order to determine if the cat is alive or dead, one must open the box and look inside. Before the box is opened, however, the cat exists in a dual state--a state of "dead" and "alive" with some probability for either state. Only when we look inside does the state of the cat become one or the other. That combined state of two (or even more)possibilities occurs in real life on the scale of the very small. Only when an observer tries to measure what state a particle (an electron or a photon or whatever) is in does the particle actually "chose" one of the states. That combined state is the ultimate yin-yang paradox!
ReplyDeleteComment #1: OMG! I don't care if I have to stand on my head. I SO WOULD for that video! I couldn't hear you exclaiming because I was exclaiming so loudly that my dogs started barking! GLORIOUS!
ReplyDeleteComment #2: Last night, I read/digested your thoughts on paradox and dualities I had a moment of insight. Somewhere in the hours I spent at United Methodist churches and UMC camps, someone talked about the trinity and, more specifically, about the Holy Ghost. The thought I had is very much like a cracked door with a bit of light coming out. I don't have the space in my life to investigate this to almost any degree, but I wonder if pursuing the Holy Ghost requires a focus beyond just the Father and Son. In other words, I wonder if Christianity, too, urges us to abandon fixation on the tangible and search for something greater.
ReplyDeleteOld Bay, this is some of the most stunning and apt photography so far. I'm specifically thinking of the photo at the garden in Tui, the cathedral photos and the two stone carvings that look kind of like people who are deep in thought and remind me of Corvid. The headless guy painting is also a favorite.
Hello Again, and yes - we need to have a proper chat when you're home!
ReplyDeleteJust realising I'm not the only one to have linked the duality/triality of Christianity and duality of quantum mechanics (your other commenters have hinted at this). As a physicist I'm used to the idea that a photon is neither a wave nor a particle - it's a photon, but in our weak intellectual state we can't comprehend that. Sometimes a wave model is valuable, sometimes a particle model is valuable to explain a particular behaviour - but a photon remains a photon.
Meanwhile we think about our understanding of the far more difficult concept of "God". There we're not only intellectually incapable of grasping it all, but spiritually too. So God provides models - sometimes the Holy Ghost/Spirit/Light is a good model, sometimes the extremely human model of Christ: we understand what it is to be human. I think in Christ God has given us a model of Himself that helps us understand a need for a relationship - because that's the centre of what we can have with humans. That allows me not to worry about the paradox of human vs divine - I can cope with both.
Perhaps Nature is another model?
Emma
ps. The sparrow like bird with a red/orange breast is probably a robin. Or maybe a chaffinch? I get a lot of both on my bird-feeder in my suburban London garden - and they bring me a moment of natural happiness every morning!